Talk:Shadow - Revision history

Aiaya: /* Just a few clarifications */

2009-02-20T08:56:22Z

Just a few clarifications

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 20 February 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:

	.d ...		.d ...

	Wouldn't it be nice to think that Citian acted as a lone martyr to disband Shadow? Dementia protested to get elder which lead to a path vote which had supposedly gone in his favor. He then decided to protest the quota by stepping down. Following his abandonment of his eldership that was granted by the aforementioned questionable vote, he gave it to IamTaquito who had planned to disband. Instead of IamTaquito following through with his own plans, eldership was handed off to Citian. In the end, the Shadow's enemy was not the quota or a lone act by Citian... it was the collective decisions made by the failed leadership of dementia, IamTaquito, and "Guide" Kamakazi. I wish Kaymat's work had not gone to waste, I also wish Draget had not been subject to a coup. But, ... like I said, it's so much easier to give all the credit to one person. In this case, Citian.

Aiaya at 08:55, 20 February 2009

2009-02-20T08:55:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:55, 20 February 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:

	.d ...		.d ...

			Wouldn't it be nice to think that Citian acted as a lone martyr to disband Shadow? Dementia protested to get elder which lead to a path vote which had supposedly gone in his favor. He then decided to protest the quota by stepping down. Following his abandonment of his eldership that was granted by the aforementioned questionable vote, he gave it to IamTaquito who had planned to disband. Instead of IamTaquito following through with his own plans, eldership was handed off to Citian. In the end, the Shadow's enemy was not the quota or a lone act by Citian... it was the collective decisions made by the failed leadership of dementia, IamTaquito, and "Guide" Kamakazi. I wish Kaymat's work had not gone to waste, I also wish Draget had not been subject to a coup. But, ... like I said, it's so much easier to give all the credit to one person. In this case, Citian.

Dementia: Just a few clarifications

2006-08-04T01:53:40Z

Just a few clarifications

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:53, 3 August 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	[[User:Scribble\|Scribble]] 9:19, 19 Sept 2005 (EST)		[[User:Scribble\|Scribble]] 9:19, 19 Sept 2005 (EST)

			== Just a few clarifications ==

			1. I closed admissions and began reworking the RP of the Shadow before there was a quota.
			2. I put together the entire framework of the Shadow RP and fleshed out most of it. I put Kaymat in charge of the Sasang, while I took direct control of Kiun. It was only to the Sasang that Kaymat added additional info to.
			3. As we began redeveloping the path under the new RP and started to bring in new members, Nexon announced the quota. At that time we had just over 20 members and it was already my plan to expand the number to 30-35. They first pushed us to thirty and I stepped down in protest giving Elder to IamTaQuito, when then a few days later, gave it to Citian.

			.d ...

Scribble at 01:18, 20 September 2005

2005-09-20T01:18:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:18, 19 September 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I don't think it's fair to level accusations about unrelated subpaths in a subpath description. I'm changing the statements to something more neutral, but I think the comparison should be removed entirely. Ideally, we should opt for the NPOV that most Wikis try for.		I don't think it's fair to level accusations about unrelated subpaths in a subpath description. I'm changing the statements to something more neutral, but I think the comparison should be removed entirely. Ideally, we should opt for the NPOV that most Wikis try for.

			[[User:Scribble\|Scribble]] 9:19, 19 Sept 2005 (EST)

Scribble at 01:17, 20 September 2005

2005-09-20T01:17:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:17, 19 September 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I thought it was best to seperate the details of the Shadow subpath from the events surrounding the actual disbanding. The disbandment can now be found under [[Shadow disbandment]]. --[[User:Zaventh\|Zaventh]] 10:09, 25 Aug 2005 (EDT)		I thought it was best to seperate the details of the Shadow subpath from the events surrounding the actual disbanding. The disbandment can now be found under [[Shadow disbandment]]. --[[User:Zaventh\|Zaventh]] 10:09, 25 Aug 2005 (EDT)

			I don't think it's fair to level accusations about unrelated subpaths in a subpath description. I'm changing the statements to something more neutral, but I think the comparison should be removed entirely. Ideally, we should opt for the NPOV that most Wikis try for.

PhantomSnake at 16:54, 25 August 2005

2005-08-25T16:54:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:54, 25 August 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I thought it was best to seperate the details of the Shadow subpath from the events surrounding the actual disbanding. The disbandment can now be found under [[Shadow ~~Disbandment~~]]. --[[User:Zaventh\|Zaventh]] 10:09, 25 Aug 2005 (EDT)		I thought it was best to seperate the details of the Shadow subpath from the events surrounding the actual disbanding. The disbandment can now be found under [[Shadow disbandment]]. --[[User:Zaventh\|Zaventh]] 10:09, 25 Aug 2005 (EDT)

Zaventh at 14:09, 25 August 2005

2005-08-25T14:09:53Z

New page

I thought it was best to seperate the details of the Shadow subpath from the events surrounding the actual disbanding. The disbandment can now be found under [[Shadow Disbandment]]. --[[User:Zaventh|Zaventh]] 10:09, 25 Aug 2005 (EDT)